Search results

7 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type















































New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
Report/Study Resilience Metrics and Measurements: Challenges and Recommendations
As part of the study run by ENISA, a set of metrics-specific questions was sent to a group of stakeholders. These questions concerned how resilience is measured on a sector basis (the surveyed participants were from public and private organisations, as well as national regulators, academia, etc.). This document presents the results of that study and aims to provide a non-technical overview to policy experts in the area of resilience. The key challenges to resilience measurements and the most interesting aspects of the answers received are summarised and analysed in this document. This report also summarises a number of recommendations arising from the analysis of the information received. The rest of the report is organised as follows. Section 2 presents the main challenges impeding the adoption of a commonly accepted framework for resilience metrics and measurements. In section 3, we summarise the main recommendations for future actions in the area of network and service resilience metrics and measurements. Finally section 4, includes all the detailed input we received from the questionnaires and interviews with stakeholders.
Located in Publications
Report/Study Troff document Resilience Metrics and Measurements: Technical Report
During the ENISA survey study on 'Resilience Metrics and Measurements: Challenges and Recommendations' it was found that there is lack of a standardised framework or good metrics. Resilience was not considered to be a well-defined term and depending on the context, it encompassed several interpretations and viewpoints. Additionally, there was consensus on the fact that information sharing and sources of consolidated information on resilience metrics were not readily available. These challenges were recognised as serious obstacles towards the adoption of resilience metrics. Addressing these concerns, this report represents an attempt to create a single technical source of information on resilience metrics, the taxonomies and the open issues. It puts together work that has been done in the areas of security, dependability and specific taxonomy research under the single umbrella of resilience. It is intended to become a source of information for the community interested on resilience and measurements, but also the cause to initiate more in depth works on the subject. This version is a discussion draft! (for comments please see contact details in the report.)
Located in Publications
EQR Issue EQR Q2 2007, vol. 3, no. 2
Open issue
Located in Publications / ENISA Quarterly Review - Archive / Past Issues
EQR Issue EQR Q4 2009, vol. 5, no. 4
Resilience metrics, Incident Reporting, Prepardness Exercises, Awareness Raising, Japan, Korea, eSignatures Interoperability, Cloud Computing, ISMS
Located in Publications / ENISA Quarterly Review - Archive / Past Issues
Resilience Metrics
ENISA'a activities on how to quantify network resilience, which are the relevant metrics and measurement frameworks.
Located in Topics / Critical Infrastructures and Services / Internet Infrastructure
Reports
Located in Topics / / Internet Infrastructure / Resilience Metrics
ENISA Video File object code Metrics Video
Located in Topics / / Internet Infrastructure / Resilience Metrics

We use cookies on our website to support technical features that enhance your user experience.
We also use analytics. To opt-out from analytics, click for more information.

I've read it More information